Contradictions in the Kingdom- Unveiling the Tensions Between ‘Tears of the Kingdom’ and ‘Skyward Sword’
Does “Tears of the Kingdom” Contradict “Skyward Sword”?
The Legend of Zelda series has always been known for its intricate storylines and rich lore. From the original “The Legend of Zelda” to the latest installment, “Tears of the Kingdom,” fans have been captivated by the adventures of Link and his quest to save Hyrule. However, as with any beloved series, there have been instances where new games seem to contradict or diverge from the established lore of previous titles. One such instance is the debate over whether “Tears of the Kingdom” contradicts “Skyward Sword.” In this article, we will explore the similarities and differences between these two games and determine if there is indeed a contradiction.
Firstly, it is important to acknowledge the shared history between “Tears of the Kingdom” and “Skyward Sword.” Both games are set in the same world of Hyrule and feature Link as the protagonist. The main goal in both games is to defeat Ganon and save the kingdom from his evil clutches. Despite these similarities, there are several areas where the two games differ significantly.
One of the most notable differences is the setting. “Skyward Sword” takes place in the sky, with Link living in the floating city of Skyloft. In contrast, “Tears of the Kingdom” is set on the ground, with Link living in the kingdom of Hyrule. This change in setting has led to some fans questioning whether the transition from Skyloft to Hyrule is a contradiction. However, it is important to remember that the developers have created a timeline that allows for such a change. The events of “Skyward Sword” could have occurred before the events of “Tears of the Kingdom,” allowing for a seamless transition between the two settings.
Another point of contention is the character of Zelda. In “Skyward Sword,” Zelda is portrayed as a young, energetic warrior who is capable of wielding a sword and defending herself. In “Tears of the Kingdom,” Zelda is depicted as a much older and more frail character. This difference has led some fans to believe that there is a contradiction in the portrayal of Zelda’s character development. However, it is possible that the developers wanted to show the evolution of Zelda’s character over time, with her growing older and more experienced.
Moreover, the narrative structure of the two games also differs. “Skyward Sword” follows a linear storyline, with players progressing through the game in a predetermined order. In contrast, “Tears of the Kingdom” offers a more open-world experience, allowing players to explore Hyrule at their own pace. This change in narrative structure has raised questions about whether the two games are connected in terms of story. However, it is important to note that the open-world nature of “Tears of the Kingdom” does not necessarily contradict the events of “Skyward Sword.” Instead, it provides players with a more immersive experience, allowing them to explore the rich history of Hyrule.
In conclusion, while there are several differences between “Tears of the Kingdom” and “Skyward Sword,” it is not accurate to say that the two games contradict each other. The developers have created a timeline that allows for the transition from Skyloft to Hyrule and the evolution of Zelda’s character. Additionally, the change in narrative structure does not necessarily imply a contradiction but rather offers a new way for players to experience the world of Hyrule. As fans of the series, it is important to embrace the changes and enjoy the unique qualities that each game brings to the table.
